Recent News 2

Proving the “Prior Action” Requirement of a Malicious Prosecution Case

Why Appellate Briefing Rules Matter

Potential Defendants in a Malicious Prosecution Case

The Perils of In-House Counsel Simultaneously Representing Company and Employee

Judge’s order to take down law firm webpages is unlawful prior restraint

Malpractice Claim Against DLA Piper Reversed

Photographers’ Rights in California

3 Reasons a Trial Lawyer Should Retain an Appellate Specialist as Co-Counsel

Defending the Malicious Prosecution claim

No Harm, No Foul: Court of Appeal lets UCLA off the hook for $16 million in lost medical data case

Establishing the “Probable Cause” Element of a Malicious Prosecution claim

Covenants not to compete still unenforceable in California

Establishing the “Favorable Termination” Element of a Malicious Prosecution claim

Three Ways a Trial Lawyer Can Strengthen the Odds of Winning on Appeal

Three key questions to ask in evaluating any potential case for Malicious Prosecution

California Supreme Court closes door to appellate review of carefully crafted interlocutory orders disguised as final judgments

Second District Approves Use of Anti-SLAPP Motion to Pare Causes of Action

Jeff Lewis Wins Arbitration Over Enforcement of Illegal Covenant not to Compete

Legal Articles of Note

Court of Appeal Declines to Use Common-Interest Doctrine to Protect from Disclosure Communications Between City and Developer